On 18/02/11, six-year-old Jack Adcock was admitted to a hospital in Leicester and tragically passed away. Numerous factors led to his death, including errors on the part of Dr Hadiza Bawa-Garba and the NHS trust.
Later, Dr Bawa-Garba was convicted of gross negligence manslaughter and suspended from, then struck off, the GMC register
Much discussion took place in both medical and public circles, including a boycott of written reflections by doctors due to concerns that these may have been used against Dr Bawa-Garba
Eventually, Dr Bawa-Garba was reinstated, and she is now practising medicine again
What should you know about Dr Bawa-Garba for Medical Interviews?
The Dr Bawa-Garba case is a relevant and recent case that aspiring medical students should learn for their medical school interviews. In this case, a 6-year-old patient with Down's Syndrome died from sepsis due to errors made by Dr Hadiza Bawa-Garba and the NHS Trust.
Dr Bawa-Garba was convicted of gross negligence manslaughter and was suspended from, then struck off, the GMC register. However, she was later reinstated and is now practising medicine again.
The case raises various ethical issues, including the extent to which doctors should be held accountable for errors made under unsuitable working conditions and the role of teamwork and communication in preventing medical errors.
Aspiring medical students should be prepared to discuss these issues during their interviews.
Six-year-old Jack Adcock was admitted to Leicester Royal Infirmary’s Children’s Assessment Unit on 18/02/11 in the morning. He presented with diarrhoea, vomiting, and difficulty breathing on a background of Down’s Syndrome, which affects the heart. Later that evening, at 9:20pm, he died from cardiac arrest secondary to sepsis.
Dr Bawa-Garba (ST6 - a 6th year specialist paediatric trainee), was solely responsible for the whole ward as there was no senior consultant available. An IT failure on that day delayed the receipt of test results - for instance, despite ordering blood tests at 10:45am, Dr Bawa-Garba did not receive them until 4:15pm.
During a handover meeting later in the day, Dr Bawa-Garba did not ask a consultant to review Jack. She also did not inform the patient’s mother that his heart medication - enalapril - should be discontinued, so his mother gave him his usual evening dose at 7pm when she should not have.
When Jack ‘crashed’ an hour later, Dr Bawa-Garba performed CPR. However, she briefly discontinued this due to confusing him with another patient who had a DNACPR. This was not deemed to have contributed to his death.
Jack passed away at 9:20pm.
Interview coaching
Choose your 1-1 interview coaching package
Rated 5.0 from 550+ reviews. Practise with experienced interview experts: mock MMI and panel interviews, plus a free Ultimate Interview Q&A Guide (worth £349) with every coaching package.
What were the legal disputes in Dr Bawa-Garba’s case?
In 2012, the GMC received a referral about Dr Bawa-Garba from Jack’s parents and began to investigate her for misconduct. Additionally, the NHS Trust informed the GMC of the incident and Dr Bawa-Garba was subjected to 3 months of supervised training and taken off the on-call rota.
In 2014, Dr Bawa-Garba was charged with gross negligence manslaughter, alongside two nurses (one of whom, Isabel Amaro, was also convicted). She was convicted in November 2015 and given a suspended prison sentence.
Following her conviction, the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) suspended Dr Bawa-Garba for 12 months rather than removing her from the register. The GMC disagreed and appealed to the High Court, which in January 2018 ordered that she be struck off entirely. Jeremy Hunt, then health and social care secretary, launched a review of gross negligence manslaughter in healthcare.
Dr Bawa-Garba later appealed against her case. She had widespread support from both doctors and the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin, who were interested in the potential role of racial discrimination in the case.
In August 2018 the Court of Appeal overturned the High Court's decision and restored the MPTS's original 12-month suspension, allowing Dr Bawa-Garba to return to practice with conditions to support her safe return after an extended absence.
What ethical issues are raised by the Dr Bawa-Garba case?
Various ethical issues are raised by the case of Dr Bawa-Garba. It’s important to think about:
To what extent should doctors be held accountable for errors made under unsuitable working conditions?
The NHS continues to face increasing systemic issues related to underfunding and understaffing. As conditions on the wards continue to deteriorate and doctors face more and more challenges, questions are being asked about the extent to which they can be held liable for errors made under these stresses.
In Dr Bawa-Garba’s case, it is clear that some systemic issues contributed to Jack Adcock’s death - such as the IT failure and the lack of a consultant. There are questions about the extent to which failings on Dr Bawa-Garba’s behalf were exacerbated by systemic issues as well.
In particular, would she have made those same errors if she were not solely responsible for managing a hectic and understaffed ward? At what point do poor working conditions affect what we can expect from doctors? Many doctors are concerned about a ‘blame culture’ where clinicians are scapegoated for systemic and governmental failures.
What is the role of teamwork and communication in preventing medical errors?
Importantly, some of the errors that were made were due to insufficient communication. For example, Dr Bawa-Garba did not seek advice from a consultant when one became available later in the day. Nurses did not sufficiently update Dr Bawa-Garba on Jack’s condition, and no one informed his mother that his heart medication should be discontinued.
This raises questions about who should be held responsible in these scenarios, and how clinical communication between members of the multidisciplinary team can be improved.
What role did self-reflection play in the court case?
Many concerns were raised about whether Dr Bawa-Garba’s self-reflections were used in the court case. In particular, doctors were worried that this would have discouraged honest reflections. A boycott was called on using self-reflections in appraisals, and even making these reflections in the first place, on the grounds that doctors were afraid to honestly admit to their mistakes and learn from them.
Whilst Dr Bawa-Garba’s personal reflective notes were not used as evidence in court, they were included in materials seen by expert witnesses that may have influenced their testimonies.
Interview coaching
Choose your 1-1 interview coaching package
Rated 5.0 from 550+ reviews. Practise with experienced interview experts: mock MMI and panel interviews, plus a free Ultimate Interview Q&A Guide (worth £349) with every coaching package.
Example Medicine Interview Question and Answer on Dr Bawa-Garba
Q: Did Dr Bawa-Garba do anything wrong in your opinion?
The case of Dr Hadiza Bawa-Garba and Jack Adcock’s death is a complex one, with numerous factors contributing to the tragic result.
On a surface level, Dr Bawa-Garba did make mistakes - for instance, she did not seek a consultant review at her handover meeting, and confused Jack with another patient who had a DNACPR so she temporarily stopped CPR. Even if this did not contribute to his death, it was still a mistake.
However, there were many broader systemic issues at play. Dr Bawa-Garba was solely responsible for an understaffed ward and did not have a senior consultant available. It is impossible to know whether she would have made exactly the same mistakes if her working conditions were better, but I have to imagine that they at least contributed somewhat to what happened.
Given this, Dr Bawa-Garba did make mistakes. However, they were not ‘unforced errors’, but rather the result of systemic failures in the NHS that must be addressed moving forward. It is hard to pass judgment one way or another on the full extent of her culpability without reviewing the evidence much more thoroughly.
What were the ethical implications of the Bawa Garba case?
Harder, less likely questions, but good for understanding:
Is it right that Dr Bawa-Garba is currently practising medicine?
Should personal reflections be allowed to be used in court cases against the doctor who wrote them?
How did the public react to the court case of Dr Bawa-Garba?
Do you believe that Dr Bawa-Garba’s race played a role in her treatment by the GMC, the courts, the public, and the media?
How would you ensure that you remain accountable and responsible for your decisions as a doctor, even under stressful or difficult working conditions?
How do you think the Dr. Bawa-Garba case has affected the public perception of the medical profession?
Do you believe that doctors who make mistakes should be criminally prosecuted, as was the case with Dr. Bawa-Garba? Why or why not?
In light of the Dr. Bawa-Garba case, what steps do you think healthcare organisations can take to support and protect their employees who make mistakes?
Overall, questions about Dr Bawa-Garba can provide a valuable opportunity to reflect on the ethical challenges that can arise in medicine and to demonstrate your ability to think critically about these issues. Please read our other articles on Charlie Gard, Abortion, Harold Shipman and more!
In 2011, six-year-old Jack Adcock died of sepsis at Leicester Royal Infirmary. Dr Hadiza Bawa-Garba, a paediatric trainee, was convicted of gross negligence manslaughter in 2015. Systemic pressures contributed, including understaffing, an IT failure delaying test results, and no consultant on the ward. She was suspended, then erased from the register, then restored in 2018.
What happened to Dr Bawa-Garba?
Dr Bawa-Garba was convicted of gross negligence manslaughter in 2015 over Jack Adcock's death. The tribunal initially suspended her for 12 months. After the GMC successfully appealed, she was erased from the medical register in 2018. She then appealed to the Court of Appeal, which overturned the erasure, and she was restored to the register under conditions.
Who was Jack Adcock?
Jack Adcock was a six-year-old boy with Down's syndrome who was admitted to Leicester Royal Infirmary on 18 February 2011 with vomiting, diarrhoea and breathing difficulty. He died that evening from a cardiac arrest secondary to sepsis. His death led to the gross negligence manslaughter convictions of Dr Bawa-Garba and a nurse, Isabel Amaro.
What is gross negligence manslaughter in medicine?
Gross negligence manslaughter is a criminal charge where a person's conduct falls so far below the expected standard that it is judged criminal. For doctors, it requires a duty of care, a breach causing death, and negligence serious enough to be criminal. The Bawa-Garba case raised concern that systemic NHS failures, not just individual error, can lead to such prosecutions.
Were Dr Bawa-Garba's reflective notes used against her in court?
Her personal reflective notes were not formally entered as evidence in court. However, reflective material was included in documents seen by expert witnesses and may have influenced testimony. This prompted widespread concern and a boycott of written reflection, as doctors feared honest learning notes could be used against them. It remains a key talking point on reflective practice.
Where is Dr Bawa-Garba now and is she still practising?
After the Court of Appeal overturned her erasure in 2018, Dr Bawa-Garba was restored to the medical register with conditions to support safe practice following her long absence. She returned to clinical work as a paediatrician. For interviews, focus on the principles of the case rather than her current personal circumstances.
What ethical issues does the Bawa-Garba case raise for medical interviews?
Key themes are accountability for errors made under unsafe working conditions, the difference between an honest mistake and recklessness, and a feared blame culture that scapegoats individuals for systemic failures. It also raises questions about reflective practice, multidisciplinary communication, and whether criminal prosecution is appropriate when understaffing and IT failures contribute to a death.
What was decided in R v Bawa-Garba?
R v Bawa-Garba was the 2015 criminal trial in which Dr Bawa-Garba was convicted of gross negligence manslaughter; her appeal against the conviction was rejected. The separate 2018 Court of Appeal case concerned her professional registration, where the GMC's erasure of her was overturned and the tribunal's original suspension restored, allowing her eventual return to practice.
Ultimate Package students from our 2025/26 cycle, with their UCAT scores and offers, who trained with us for the UCAT, personal statements and interviews.
Ultimate Package
S
Sophie
Medicine, King's College London
2025 UCAT2,590 / 2,700
“Harry got my UCAT up to 2,590, working through the sections I kept dropping marks on week by week. Gemma then ran my interview practice so the MMI stations didn't catch me out, and Dr Akash mentored me the whole way through. I'm off to King's for Medicine.”
Ultimate Package
D
Daniel
Medicine, University College London
Medicine offers4 offers
“The interview prep was the part that actually moved the needle. Proper mock MMIs, not just lists of questions, and feedback that was honest about what I was getting wrong. I ended up with four offers and firmed UCL.”
Ultimate Package
A
Aisha
Dentistry, University of Birmingham
Dentistry offers4 offers
“The Ultimate Package kept me organised from UCAT through to interviews. They knew what dental schools actually ask and tightened up my personal statement. Four offers in the end, and I'm going to Birmingham.”
Ultimate Package
C
Charlotte
Veterinary Medicine, Royal Veterinary College
Vet offers4 offers
“Vet applications come down to the written SAQs as much as the interview. Dr Rebecca went through my SAQs line by line, sharpened my answers and prepped me for the panels. I came away with four offers and chose the RVC.”
